Thanks to the Bush administration’s Obscenity Prosecution Task Force, Stagliano and his production company were indicted on federal obscenity charges after the FBI watched Jay Sin’s Milk Nymphos and Storm Squirters 2: Target Practice. While Obama’s justice department has better things to do than go after pornographers, the case (which originated in December 2007) has wide implications on all festish films. Anything considered “extreme”–including squirting, pissing, bondage, leather, rubber, and even foot fetish movies–could be pulled from shelves if the jury sides with the prosecution. Let’s hope this jury is OK with a little watersports.
More on why this matters here, and here’s some of what jurors saw yesterday, via Washington City Paper:
This morning, jurors viewed a 36 minute scene from Storm Squirters 2: Target Practice, a film about women expelling impressive amounts of discharge from their vaginas—colloquially, “squirting.”
The trajectory of the scene went something like this:
Porn performers Angela Stone and Richelle Ryan are just hanging out in a living room, commenting on the quality of each others’ asses. “Have you ever squirted before?” Stone asks Ryan. Ryan has not. “Have you seen a girl squirt before?” Again, no. One thing leads to another. “I want to use you as target practice,” Stone tells Ryan, as Ryan performs oral sex on her.
Stone screams very loudly and squirts a clear substance into Ryan’s mouth. Ryan gargles. They furiously make out. Then, the naked guy shows up. That’s Jay Lassiter. They all have sex together in various ways. Despite the ejaculatory role-reversal that Storm Squirters 2: Target Practice is predicated on, the scene ends with Lassiter ejaculating onto the faces and mouths of Stone and Ryan.
[…]
As the scene played, a couple of the female jurors remove their headsets, relieving themselves of the frequent sounds of gargling, gushing, and the two women choking on Lassiter’s penis.
I rail against socialism and socialists. Obama is just the current figure head for that failed philosophy. Still, I can’t recall ‘railing’ against the President specifically in any recent comments. I guess it was just his turn this time.
When this case was initiated, is irrelevant except under a totalitarian view. Our founders established a system of seperation of powers. Under that concept, the judiciary wheels of justice would proceed without interference as Obama has done in the case of the racist New Black Panthers. They are found guilty but because they are are also found black, the charges are dropped. Two more lawyers from the DOJ have come forward in the last few days to confirm this official bias on the part of the administration.
This particular judge, not the administration ended this case. Obama has been President for 18 months. This was his incompetant Department of Justice that was kicked out of court. They failed. Fortunately, our founding fathers system of right and wrong did not fail in this case.
I should think we would both be pleased.
Albert, as I noted above, this case was initiated under the Bush administration and one of its task forces, IN 2007. Using this as another attempt to rail against Obama (as you do in all your comments on multiple sites) is ridiculous.
Agree with your view ‘R.’
On the surprising plus side, the judge has dismissed this case as the Obama Administration did not meet legal muster in their preperation.
Obama’s SCOTUS nomination of Kagan speaks to his views on the First Amendment.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/39034.html
Sucking up to get some work in straight porn Wolf? I guess being a mope isn’t what it was cracked up to be now was it?
In honor of your love for Michael Jackson I will link Howard Stern and Robin Quivers beautiful tribute to MJ after his death.
Obama has been President for 18 months. This is his Justice Department prosecuting this case.
I am sure you are aware he had his Justice Department drop the case abainst the New Black Panthers who had commited blatant voter intimidation during his election. A default judgemnent of guilty had already been rendered. If Obama wanted this case dropped, he would do it. The more important things for his Justice Department you refer too include sueing Arizona for inforcing Federal Immigration law. Obama does not want federal imigration law inforced.
The problem here is the color of the participants so the case will continue.
I am pulling for him. He is a good man and this whole case is outrages!
Wolf Hudson