You don’t have to imagine the visuals that could derail this douche bag’s confirmation hearing … we’ve got them inside.
“The lady doth protest too much, me thinks.” Lambda Legal called Justice Bill Pryor the ‘most demonstrably anti-gay judicial nominee in recent memory’. As we reported back in May (see original post below), his own memory falls a little short on what he did in college to make a little extra scratch.
GayStarNews and other outlets have now picked up on the story. Just remember, you heard it here first.
For a jerk whp wants gays jailed for sex in their private homes, he has a lot to account for. Let’s hope he never even gets a confirmation hearing.
In the meantime, the best way to get out of the post-election funk is to volunteer … and imagine how he’ll try and explain these pictures to Mike Pence.
[Original Post: May 20, 2016] The fact that virulently anti-gay Justice Bill Pryor allegedly appeared on a gay porn site is a big deal. But now that he’s appeared on the Donald’s SCOTUS list, it’s a huge deal.
Worst case scenario would be having to endure Trump/Pence for eight years. But if they get to pick to a SCOTUS judge, America will have to live with that appointment for a lifetime. Justice Pryor would let states jail LGBT people for having sex in their homes. Have I got your attention now?
Within the law, of course, what Judge Pryor or anyone may have done with their penis as a college student, i.e. posing for gay porn pictures, should have no bearing on their judicial aptitude. This is about what he has done and potentially will do with his gavel.
Law focused blog LegalSchnauzer first uncovered the images in 2013 and with Judge Pryor making national headlines again, they have updated their original story.
Alleged original image as published by BadPuppy.com (click to open full size)
Those who think Donald Trump is not a serious presidential candidate received new ammunition yesterday with the release of a list of individuals Trump considers possible nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. Included on the list is an Alabama judge who posed nude during his college days for a series of photographs that wound up at the BadPuppy.com gay-pornography Web site in the late ’90s.
William H. “Bill” Pryor’s foray into gay porn probably is more substantive than anything he’s done as a judge. President George W. Bush nominated the virulently homophobic Pryor to the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 2003, even though the Alabama attorney general had zero experience as a judge–not even in municipal or traffic court.
Nude photographs of federal judge Bill Pryor appeared in the 1990s on a gay pornography Web site, a Legal Schnauzer investigation shows.
The photos appeared in 1997 on BadPuppy.com, which was in its online infancy, having debuted in mid 1995. Based in Cocoa, Florida, the site has morphed into one of the largest gay porn sites on the Web.
Images obtained by Legal Schnauzer show Pryor posing completely nude, staring into the camera and sporting a noticeable erection. We see no indication that the photos were taken surreptitiously, without Pryor’s knowledge. Sources say Pryor was college age when the photos were taken.
Alleged original image as published by BadPuppy.com (click to open full size)Is there doubt about the photographs’ authenticity? Well, a major Republican political figure in Alabama was shown the pictures in the late ’90s and immediately exclaimed, “Holy Cow, That’s Bill Pryor!” A former female political journalist at a Birmingham news outlet was shown the photos and reportedly guffawed and semi-fainted at the same time. Did either of those insiders express any doubt that it was Bill Pryor in the photo? Nope.
Here’s more about the photographs’ history:
Alabama law-enforcement officials became aware of the photos at BadPuppy.com in 1997, not long before Governor Fob James appointed Pryor attorney general. An investigation ensued, and multiple officials familiar with that process have told Legal Schnauzer that the photos are, in fact, of the Bill Pryor who now sits on the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Sources say the photos were taken while Pryor was a student at Northeast Louisiana University (now University of Louisiana Monroe) from 1980 to 1984.
Legal Schnauzer contacted Judge Pryor last Friday via e-mail, seeking an interview about the photographs and their possible implications for his role on the federal bench. Pryor responded as follows:
“I have nothing to say to you except that these accusations are totally false. Do not contact me again. Bill Pryor.”
If the photos were not of Pryor, wouldn’t it be easy for the judge to invite an inquisitive reporter to his office at the Hugo Black Courthouse in downtown Birmingham, lay out several family photos of himself from the undergrad days, show that he didn’t look then like the young man in the photo (with a noticeable erection), and put the story to bed? That would seem like an easy way to handle it. But Pryor never has done that.
Perhaps most troubling of all is reports that the secrets in Pryor’s past actually helped his judicial career–that he was nominated to the bench so he would be vulnerable to blackmail, ensuring that he would steer cases to outcomes favorable to conservative interests. Here’s how we described it in a December 2014 post:
In fact, our sources say conservative forces pushed George W. Bush to make the appointment, not because of any legal expertise on Pryor’s part, but because his secrets make him controllable. [Journalist Wayne] Madsen calls Pryor a “gatekeeper” for Republican interests. Others have called him a “fixer,” that he protects Karl Rove’s agenda on the bench. Rove once served as Pryor’s campaign manager in a race for Alabama attorney general.
Either way, Pryor appears to be a judge of dubious integrity.
Dubious indeed.
And now, back to our regularly scheduled pornography.
I have known him since about 1994 and I guarantee you that it it him.
Besides the resemblance he is very feminine acting. His brother is 100% gay and half nuts. His father, who was adopted, was somewhat effeminate and was the BAND DIRECTOR at the local Roman Catholic boys school (later co-ed). My wife was in his grade in H.S.(about 3 years after it became c0-ed) and said he never dated and by his mannerisms and social activity she assumed he was gay. Finally, he ;personally went after Judge Roy Moore in 2002 on some pretty frivolous charges. Moore may be a homophomophome, a bigot, etc. but he is not a child molester and he is sincere in his beliefs, unlike Pryor. What a perfect way to prove you are not gay than to go after the #1 enemy of gays in the state—as Pryor did.
Lastly, he is a fu*king jerk, a back stabber, a social climber that steps on everyone’s toes going up and you know what happens to those kind on the way down.
I don’t buy it. The mouth of the young man in the nude shot is much narrower than the mouth on Judge Pryor. The use of the same name doesn’t prove anything. If anything, the likelihood is that the name used with the naked shot was a pseudonym, and NOT the real name of the subject.
It isn’t him. His upper lip is noticeably smaller–upper lips elongate with age, they don’t shorten. Additionally, the twink’s chin is squared, Pryor’s is not.
The fact he is virulently homophobic and possibly on the SC bothers me much more than nude photos taken when he was 18-21 or whatever. Plus there is a huge correlation between virulent homophobia and being a closet case. I seriously doubt a boy from a prominent devout Catholic family in the south would do such a thing anyway. I never did anything that would besmirch my family name for a very long time. My grandmother was revered, all my dad’s brothers had businesses, and one was the president of the school board for 25 years. It was a different time.
That said, I have kind of general blond European features, and people mistook me for other people all the time when I was 20-35. I mean hey, there are 3 or 4 hundred million people in the USA. The Bill Pryor part might be a little harder to dismiss, but models pick simple names in nude photography, porn whatever. My 2 cents.
oh geez, someone just found a pic that looks like Matt Damon from 80 years ago, and don’t we all remember the Nick Cage vampire pic from a long time ago. Don’t get me wrong this man SHOULD not be any where near politics or the supreme court.
Being naked in a photograph is not a crime in the USA, is it? And please don’t tell me erections are punishable. A real man is proud of his boner. It doesn’t mean he’s same-sex-oriented, just that he’s a normal man. A horrible man; but that’s pretty normal.
The hair is parted on the left or right in photos, depending on whether the image is a negative or positive and/or on whether the image has been flipped left to right.
Good grief did he murder anyone? Did he distroy people’s lives like some on Wall Street did? Is he chopping people’s heads off? Is he building bombs ? Grow up shit heads and get your priorities in order before it’s too late
He has indirectly done all that you have stated. If he wants to be closeted that’s his right but if he goes after my rights….the rights of a tax paying US citizen…..then alls fair. People like him need not be in office swearing to uphold the rights of ALL US citizens.
I disagree with most here. I DON’T think this nude model is Judge Pryor, and I DON’T think there’s a facial match.
The difference between the height of the models eyebrows, compared to the judges eyebrows is very insignificant, because as we age our eyebrows tend to drop a little. (Which is why plastic surgeons appear to raise the eyebrows when performing a facelift to restore a more youthful appearance).
But other differences between the models face and the judges face CANNOT be explained away by age.
1. While the space between the mouth and the chin appears to be about the SAME for the model and the judge, the SPACE between the MOUTH and the NOSE is much GREATER on the MODEL, and age could NOT account for that difference, (if the model is in his 20’s, and the judge is now in his 40’s). The spacial difference between the NOSE and the MOUTH should be the SAME. But it isn’t, because they’re NOT the same person!
2. The models MOUTH is about the WIDTH, of the models NOSE. While the judges MOUTH is about TWICE the WIDTH, of the judges NOSE. Once again if this is the judge at 20 years of age, there is no aging process that would explain the WIDTH of the judges mouth WIDENING that dramatically over 20 years! These are photographs of two DIFFERENT people in my opinion!
3. Then the EARS of the model and the judge, hang at a DIFFERENT angles. (More VERTICLE on the judge, less so on the model). The EAR design (folds, etc.) also appear DIFFERENT. Plus the TOP of the judges EARS are at the height of his EYEBROWS, while the TOP of the models EARS barely reach the height of his EYES!
Judge Pryor is NOT the person modeling nude in this photograph, in my view. (The judges senior high school or graduation photographs should put this to rest once and for all!)
(Sandy K) I took a good look at the space between the nose and mouth and agree that the nude model has a much greater space and if you’re right that age doesn’t account, then it couldn’t be the same person.
I also forgot to mention in my longer post – someone suggested that the judge could sit down with a reporter and show his high school photos or whatever. (a) he doesn’t have to under any circumstances and (b) if he really didn’t do it, I wouldn’t be bothered correcting people’s petty fantasies either.
First of all if Trump wins the White House then the democrats should filibuster any Supreme Court nominees his entire four years. No new judges until 2020.
For a jerk whp wants gays jailed for sex in their private homes, he has a lot to account for. Let’s hope he never even gets a confirmation hearing. 
If the photos were not of Pryor, wouldn’t it be easy for the judge to invite an inquisitive reporter to his office at the Hugo Black Courthouse in downtown Birmingham, lay out several family photos of himself from the undergrad days, show that he didn’t look then like the young man in the photo (with a noticeable erection), and put the story to bed? That would seem like an easy way to handle it. But Pryor never has done that.
Why can’t someone run his face through face-recognition software?
I have known him since about 1994 and I guarantee you that it it him.
Besides the resemblance he is very feminine acting. His brother is 100% gay and half nuts. His father, who was adopted, was somewhat effeminate and was the BAND DIRECTOR at the local Roman Catholic boys school (later co-ed). My wife was in his grade in H.S.(about 3 years after it became c0-ed) and said he never dated and by his mannerisms and social activity she assumed he was gay. Finally, he ;personally went after Judge Roy Moore in 2002 on some pretty frivolous charges. Moore may be a homophomophome, a bigot, etc. but he is not a child molester and he is sincere in his beliefs, unlike Pryor. What a perfect way to prove you are not gay than to go after the #1 enemy of gays in the state—as Pryor did.
Lastly, he is a fu*king jerk, a back stabber, a social climber that steps on everyone’s toes going up and you know what happens to those kind on the way down.
LOL, your Moore comment didn’t age well…
I don’t buy it. The mouth of the young man in the nude shot is much narrower than the mouth on Judge Pryor. The use of the same name doesn’t prove anything. If anything, the likelihood is that the name used with the naked shot was a pseudonym, and NOT the real name of the subject.
The chins are way off….And every man in the south either has or has had that haircut
ears match , forensics done.
It isn’t him. His upper lip is noticeably smaller–upper lips elongate with age, they don’t shorten. Additionally, the twink’s chin is squared, Pryor’s is not.
The fact he is virulently homophobic and possibly on the SC bothers me much more than nude photos taken when he was 18-21 or whatever. Plus there is a huge correlation between virulent homophobia and being a closet case. I seriously doubt a boy from a prominent devout Catholic family in the south would do such a thing anyway. I never did anything that would besmirch my family name for a very long time. My grandmother was revered, all my dad’s brothers had businesses, and one was the president of the school board for 25 years. It was a different time.
That said, I have kind of general blond European features, and people mistook me for other people all the time when I was 20-35. I mean hey, there are 3 or 4 hundred million people in the USA. The Bill Pryor part might be a little harder to dismiss, but models pick simple names in nude photography, porn whatever. My 2 cents.
this is easy enough doesnt bad puppy have proof of age records?? by law you have to have that stuff on file
If this is him, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let these be released to the media. Bury this motherfucker
A mans ears and nose grow larger as he ages. Likely could be him IMHO
oh geez, someone just found a pic that looks like Matt Damon from 80 years ago, and don’t we all remember the Nick Cage vampire pic from a long time ago. Don’t get me wrong this man SHOULD not be any where near politics or the supreme court.
I think this is GREAT! Actually, we need to place a bounty on every Republican congressman and judge in the nation. Fuck them all!
oh my god ! What a Prick !
Being naked in a photograph is not a crime in the USA, is it? And please don’t tell me erections are punishable. A real man is proud of his boner. It doesn’t mean he’s same-sex-oriented, just that he’s a normal man. A horrible man; but that’s pretty normal.
Well his wife should be able to comment on that boner – – if she has ever seen himnaked that is :-)
Don’t think that’s the same person. Nose is completely different, not a biggie but hair is parted on left in young pics and right in robes.
The hair is parted on the left or right in photos, depending on whether the image is a negative or positive and/or on whether the image has been flipped left to right.
Trumps wife poses nude, why shouldn’t his choice of judge. Trump is a world wide joke, we finally have gone to hell in a hand basket.
Good grief did he murder anyone? Did he distroy people’s lives like some on Wall Street did? Is he chopping people’s heads off? Is he building bombs ? Grow up shit heads and get your priorities in order before it’s too late
He has indirectly done all that you have stated. If he wants to be closeted that’s his right but if he goes after my rights….the rights of a tax paying US citizen…..then alls fair. People like him need not be in office swearing to uphold the rights of ALL US citizens.
Yew kneed to lern to spel.
I disagree with most here. I DON’T think this nude model is Judge Pryor, and I DON’T think there’s a facial match.
The difference between the height of the models eyebrows, compared to the judges eyebrows is very insignificant, because as we age our eyebrows tend to drop a little. (Which is why plastic surgeons appear to raise the eyebrows when performing a facelift to restore a more youthful appearance).
But other differences between the models face and the judges face CANNOT be explained away by age.
1. While the space between the mouth and the chin appears to be about the SAME for the model and the judge, the SPACE between the MOUTH and the NOSE is much GREATER on the MODEL, and age could NOT account for that difference, (if the model is in his 20’s, and the judge is now in his 40’s). The spacial difference between the NOSE and the MOUTH should be the SAME. But it isn’t, because they’re NOT the same person!
2. The models MOUTH is about the WIDTH, of the models NOSE. While the judges MOUTH is about TWICE the WIDTH, of the judges NOSE. Once again if this is the judge at 20 years of age, there is no aging process that would explain the WIDTH of the judges mouth WIDENING that dramatically over 20 years! These are photographs of two DIFFERENT people in my opinion!
3. Then the EARS of the model and the judge, hang at a DIFFERENT angles. (More VERTICLE on the judge, less so on the model). The EAR design (folds, etc.) also appear DIFFERENT. Plus the TOP of the judges EARS are at the height of his EYEBROWS, while the TOP of the models EARS barely reach the height of his EYES!
Judge Pryor is NOT the person modeling nude in this photograph, in my view. (The judges senior high school or graduation photographs should put this to rest once and for all!)
(Sandy K) I took a good look at the space between the nose and mouth and agree that the nude model has a much greater space and if you’re right that age doesn’t account, then it couldn’t be the same person.
I also forgot to mention in my longer post – someone suggested that the judge could sit down with a reporter and show his high school photos or whatever. (a) he doesn’t have to under any circumstances and (b) if he really didn’t do it, I wouldn’t be bothered correcting people’s petty fantasies either.
First of all if Trump wins the White House then the democrats should filibuster any Supreme Court nominees his entire four years. No new judges until 2020.
Agreed.
it might be big enough, but I don’t think it looks huge.
so, the Donald engaged in non monogamous sex outside his marriage- but only our sex is bad…..
Love that Trump’s freakishly small finger is the penis substitute!
The ears match so it is him.
Jesus Chris – VOTE PEOPLE!