Next Door Studios Goes Bareback

Yep, another condom-only studio has gone over to the dark side. Or the hotter, barer side, as you may see it.

Next Door Buddies today is releasing their first bareback scene featuring Slate Steele, Cole Christianson, and Austin Storm. It’s called “Suck,” but there’s a fair amount of bareback fucking involved, and the studio has been tweeting about how RAW it is.

As of last month, there was just about an even split among the major studios and web players in the gay porn world, with 19 (by our count) having gone bareback in recent years (or, in the case of Treasure Island, a decade ago), and 21 still in the condom-only camp. With this move by Next Door, that brings it to an even 20-20. [UPDATE: Actually, the current tally is 23 bareback, 18 condom. See the updated lists here.)

From the description and the photos below it looks like there’s no Treasure Island-style hole breeding, but rather everybody pulls out. And just to make things seem a little more innocent, there are lollipops involved.

Austin pumps him from behind as Cole watches on, Slate nibbling every now and again on the tip of Cole’s cock, driving him crazy as he nearly bursts with anticipation. Finally it his his turn, so he flips Slate around onto his back and slowly inserts his hard cock in the Slate’s cock-stretched hole, fucking him missionary as Slate cums all over his chest, before Cole pulls out and he and Austin take turns blasting Slate with their sticky sweet loads.



[Next Door Buddies: Suck]

32 thoughts on “Next Door Studios Goes Bareback”

  1. Clarification: The recent productions are not Next Door’s first bareback videos. They released at least two quite some time back: “Alex and Iggy” and “Louis and Pascal.” I think they are from sometime around 2007, maybe earlier.

  2. As long as they are on PrEP they can go condomless with almost the same risk mitigation as condoms.

    Condoms are no longer the only way to prevent the spread on HIV

    1. Your competitor KruezerAtNight.com featured this NDS story as one of his scoops on October 16 (the day before you came out with it) and included some details and observations you don’t report.

      Might be the professional and proper thing to credit him as your inspiration and/or source dontcha think?

      1. Sock Puppet check on aisle nine, please! Lookie, it’s Kent Barclay, aka “Damon Kruezer” posting under another fake name, and this one the “co-author/editor/whatever” of his “book.”

  3. Love the video, but there should have been more fucking for their first bareback scene. Regardless of what any of you say, their sales are going to go up and I can’t wait to see what super hot guys do bareback!

  4. Not sure what their record’s been in regards to bareback porn in the pas t but if they are like Lucas and total hypocrites who said they would never do bareback and then did a complete 180 all out of greed for money then I will not be buying their videos or paying to view there scenes. I do not want my porn spending to support a company that used to attack the porn I like whenever they had the chance. I hate backstabbers and snakes and that is exactly what Lucas is.

  5. BB POZ PIG SMUT PUP

    LOLLIPOPS! THIS IS A FUCKING OUTRAGE. DON’T THEY KNOW THAT KIND OF RECKLESS BEHAVIOR CAN LEAD TO DIABETES! THIS STUDIO IS COMPLETELY IRRESPONSIBLE FOR CONDONING THIS KIND OF PORN AND RISKING THE LIVES OF THEIR EMPLOYEES AND MODELS. I’M SO DISGUSTED AND DISAPPOINTED. PATHETIC HYPOCRITES. 20-20!!!!!!!!!!

  6. Awesome News!!

    Now I will now take the time to watch their videos.

    If it’s not bareback , it’s not worth my money or time.

  7. Cue the breathless, exaggerated, pollyanna and downright disgistingly, offensive comments that the Sword commentariat seems to be so good at spewing about POZ people in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1……

    How many times will AIDS be mentioned? How many times will death be mentioned? How many will say HIV and not know the difference between it and AIDS I’ve got my bets going, anyone want to throw their hats in the ring?

  8. Bye-Bye Next Door. No longer interest on you. So bad for the performers. Money is one thing, respect is another.
    Which performer from Next Door is being the next HIV+?

    1. What a truly idiotic statement! Sean Cody, Corbin Fisher and Bel Ami which are the big 3 in gay porn have been doing bareback scenes for a while now, and have you ever heard of a HIV epidemic among their performers? The three studios I mentioned are the most well known gay porn studios, where is your indignation for them? I bet you watch those scenes with their performers and don’t open your mouth, yet NDS does the same thing and goes bareback and suddenly twits like you and others pull a Chicken Little and go around lamenting: “The sky is falling”!!!

    2. If we were to define people at high risk of infection I’m thinking hookers and porn stars are on that list. So they use condoms (or do not now) on camera….. They are still high risk. Plus I think its safe to assume that many performs are poz anyway.

  9. Lollipops? Don’t think you can get away with this, Jake Owens was THE original lollipop twink.

    Also, bareback alone does not make the quality of porn better. If you have a mediocre product, and then just subtract the condoms, its not really any better.

  10. Next Door Studios: Hey Rod sorry you got a bad case of AIDS up your keister but we’ll always be your family. Oh did we mention we’re going bareback?

  11. I truly hope Vinny Castillo featuring a bareback video, since he does it on straight porn. I would love to see him toping Slate Steele too. Now about this video: very weak. The cocks are not hard and the bare part is too short. Btw, whata fuck was that intro??

  12. WHAT THE FUCK, WHAT THE FUCK?!! None of these studios have learned from the past or the shit straight porn is going through right now. Fuck I’m so disappointed the way gay porn is heading . Shame for shame I thought the porn world had more respect but it is porn after all what should I have expected. Oh well AIDS is here to stay.

    1. Explain to me (and the rest of us) how you hysteric queens keep insisting that AIDS magically sprouts inside two HIV-NEGATIVE people barebacking????

      1. Current testing limitations (both EIA and western blot tests can give false-negs and false positives) means there’s still a possibility that the performers aren’t as negative as they think they are. There’s nothing hysterical about seeing the good sense in promoting the use of protection by sex workers in their workplace. In my opinion that’s preferable to paying them to risk their health and their lives just to satisfy the adult entertainment needs of bareback fetishists.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top