What Happened To This Next Door Model’s Penis?

Something just… doesn’t look right.

I’m more than a little bit freaked out right now. It’s this new guy from Next Door Male. Here’s what he looks like, facially.

50315_05

50315_08

His porn name is Axle Futura, and he clearly put a ton of time into coming up with that one.

I wasn’t actually sure what happened here. I thought it might be an injury. Maybe his forskin melted somehow in a terrible science-class acid accident. But no, I guess having a piece of your foreskin that’s attached to the head of your penis is something that happens sometimes. If you’re uncut. Or cut poorly?

Anyway, it’s a pretty thick cock, but I think getting up close to it might be shocking.

Observe. And please advise if this is also brand new to you.

I really thought I’d seen a lot of cock.

axle-future-penis-2

axle-future-penis-3

axle-future-penis-4

axle-future-penis-1

axle-future-penis-5

axle-future-penis-6

 

 

[Next Door Male: Axle Futura]
 

41 thoughts on “What Happened To This Next Door Model’s Penis?”

  1. Frederick Rhodes

    That guy is definitely a victim of a botched circumcision. Circumcision is used by heterosexual religious fanatics who don’t want their sons to be gay, because, they say, the foreskin is the feminine part of the penis because men can use each other’s skin tubes like a vagina for stimulating mutual sexual pleasure. Circumcision is used as religious hygiene, a hate crime against the natural bisexuality of humans caused by religious superstitions. Excessive nerve damage caused in infancy to the masculine prepuce can lead to psychological and physical sexual dysfunctions developing after puberty, and can be used by religious witch doctors as population control on the weak minded religious fanatics. Circumcision has nothing to do with practicing proper hygiene but punishment for not practicing proper hygiene.

  2. The synechia or skin adhesions can occur also in uncircumcised males. It can sometimes cause pain when the male has an erection but often it is asymptomatic and just of cosmetic interest. It’s easily corrected by a urologist should one want to have it corrected.

    1. The synechia does exist in all uncircumcised males at birth, and typically dissolves over a number of years. Sometimes remnants can remain, or small wounds in the synechia may result in adhesions. But in those cases, you would still have a perfectly shaped foreskin, just attached on the inside to the glans. You wouldn’t have this skin seemingly fused into the glans with no regular edge.

  3. I should have known....

    The foreskin Nazis would be out in full force….:)

    Is it possible that he was born withou foreskin? It happens to about 5% of all newborn boys. This is a condition known as aposthia.

    1. No, it’s not possible that he was born without foreskin. Yes there is that condition. But read “whatUNeverknew”‘s explanation it will make sense. There were two raw wounds, and they got attached and healed together. If there was no foreskin, the ridge of the corona of the glans would be perfectly visible and wouldn’t have pieces of skin fused to it.

  4. I see a bit of misinformation so I want to make things clear. These are skin bridges. It is not a “botch” circumcision, because the circumcision was not done “incorrectly”. He cannot sue, due to it not being a matter of malpractice, and because of statutes of limitations.

    Before the foreskin can be removed, a membrane called synechia between the glans and the inner foreskin must be torn apart. This tearing leaves the entire glans penis to be a raw wound. The crush point where the foreskin is amputated is also a raw wound. When two raw wounds meet, the body has no way of knowing that they shouldn’t heal together, so they do.

    This is different than “ADHESIONS”. (even though the word is appropriate to what happens) Adhesions can occur after all of the wounds have healed, and do not necessarily involve the cut line. The function of the foreskin in young boys is to remain over the glans for protection. The inner foreskin will sometimes re-attach to the glans. Hormone levels are part of what causes the skin to release over time, so, assuming that there are no WOUNDS involved, adhesions should release in time as they naturally would have if the boy had not been cut, no tearing or cutting required.

    Foreskin is natural and has many functions (including sexual), and no one should steal it from another person. \ /,,

    1. The statue of Limitations vary by state, usually it is a window of 2 years for example from the time he realised the damange done to him.

      It also depends on if the alledged “parents” will give up the name of the butcher….

      Remember, the statue of limitations on malpractice can expire, however the butcher being cut up in the same manner can happen at any time the victim chooses …..

  5. Force genital cutting on your son, they said.
    It’ll look better, they said.

    His foreskin didn’t melt, but it was cut off against his will when he was a baby then it later developed skin-bridge. It’s a common result from force genital cutting in young humans because the foreskin is fused to the head and it was trying to heal itself when it was forced separated and cut. What is left of his foreskin was trying to heal itself.

    Moral of the story.

    Do force genital cutting on your son. HIS COCK. HIS CHOICE.

  6. Definitively improper healing from a circumcision resulting in a skin bridge.

    This is what happens: after circumcision, there is a wound in the skin where the foreskin used to be. The skin tries to heal. Parents are told to put vaseline on the glans and area of the cut with every diaper change. If they fail to do so, the wound may come in contact with the mucosa surface of the glans, and start attaching there – this is call adhesion.

    When adhesions occur, the pediatrician often yanks it by force (causing bleeding and pain) to separate them. If they fail to do so, the skin will become stronger, and then years later, there is a skin bridge. So much for being cleaner, now having folds that can’t be unfolded to clean.

    The skin bridge can be removed with a brief surgery, but it will definitively leave scars on the glans and require a couple of weeks of abstinence. His case seems quite severe though.

  7. J.W, This is a skin bridge from circumcision when the foreskin remnant tries to re-adhere to the glans (in infancy, the foreskin is fused to the glans for protection). It cannot happen to “uncut” men.

  8. Those are some serious skin adhesions. They’re a common negative side effect from infant circumcision. I bet that your unethical pro-circumcision “doctor$$$” didn’t tell you about that, huh?

    It’s 2014 – why are stupid people still cutting their kids? Oh yeah, because they’re STUPID.

    Circumcision is barbaric and stupid. I don’t care if an adult man wants to sexually downgrade their genitals through circumcision, but to force this onto a non-consenting infant is just cruel, unethical and barbaric.

  9. Aaarrrr the poor guy, that looks like it might hurt!!!! Not much sympathy going round here…

    Well he looks amazing, nice body, cute face… I’d still take his cock :)

  10. Botched dick for a botched face…..I was gonna say Gmos…He looks young and the new generation is looking more and more mutant these days. Big foreheads. Eyes to close together..UGH.

  11. In my country all boys before going to high school should be circumsized otherwise he get bullied by saying he’s weak and gay that’s why I was surprised in Europe this wasnt practiced.

    1. Goes to show how fucked up your country is. And if bullies are calling kids gay because they’re uncircumcised, then what does that make the bullies for looking at penises to check? lol

      And I find it odd that circumcision is a common practice in a nation that’s predominately Catholic, since Latin-America, a predominately Catholic region, is so against circumcision and base that from their religion.

    2. Frederick Rhodes

      Bullying young men to get circumcised is witchcraft. Your country was invaded by Muslims who started the curse of circumcision.

  12. Yeah, Dr. Butcher MD strikes again. Poor guy deserves a do-over. He’s likely to be straight and will find that many girls don’t have exacting standards for a penis. A gay dude, on the other hand, might just kick that bargain basement wiener to the curb.

    1. Dude you can see the circumcision discolorations. Not to mention the fact that that’s clearly keratinized, circumcised skin under the head. Uncut dicks have moist skin under the hood. That’s a cut dick, and a badly done job, clear as day.

    2. Frederick Rhodes

      Infant circumcision is against the teachings of Jesus and the Catholic Church. Your parents were fooled into committing this anti-Christ ritual on you by religious, medical witch-craft.

  13. Yep, skin bridges that developed after a circumcision. These should have been cut long ago. Now it’ll just look worse…if that’s possible.

  14. More than likely it is a botched circumcision. There are some people who have extremely sensitive foreskin that are closely attached to the shaft of the penis. I Remember I was giving a BJ to this one guy with such foreskin. It was just too intense for him, to the point he felt like it was hurting, when I was trying to pull his foreskin all the way down lol.

    1. Looks like a post-circumcision adhesion that could easily be removed with a few minor, minimally invasive snips. Circumcision is barbarism.

      1. Nope Circumsizion isnt barbaric as they said if we pee the uncircumsized penis’ tip skin tend to have a foul smell in contrast to circumsized one. Maybe this is for hygienic purposes.

        1. What a load of B.S.. If a man can’t keep himself clean in all aspects of personal hygiene then he has more problems than simply his foreskin..The same goes for wiping your ass properly!! Circumsion is considered barbaric genital mutilation in most countries, it is done mostly for “religious” reasons as if that is any excuse to mutilate defenselss children.. Some backwards countries also do female genital mutilation of young girls in the name of religion.. I bet you are also an advocate for that as well, probably because it also goes on in your country. . The foreskin has a lot of nerve endings and is there for protective reasons. Grown men can get circumcised if they choose in my opinion because they will by that time will have all the facts and not rely on outdated medical beliefs that it is for hygiene or health reasons.

          1. K you’re the stupid one, I was telling the truth here. And americans used to be circumsized after birth right you’re the one who imposed that.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top