Straight Porn For Gay Men?

2107_01

Next Door Hook-Ups, Straight Guys For Gay Eyes, and Corbin Fisher’s American College Sex are just a few of the sites that market straight porn to gay men. Why bother?

If you’re gay (and if you’re here, I’m assuming most of you are), why spend money on straight porn when you could spend it on gay porn? Sites like Next Door Hook-Ups, Straight Guys For Gay Eyes, Straight Boys Fucking, and American College Sex–which are all under the umbrella of larger, gay porn megasites that are owned and operated by gay men–position themselves as being produced with a gay fan’s taste in mind, which means you’ll get more close-up, extended shots of the man’s asshole and balls from behind than you will close-up, extended shots of the woman’s vagina. The other appeal is that you, the gay viewer, are getting to see a straight man having the kind of raw, animalistic sex that he really wants to have (with a woman), as opposed to the gay-for-pay sex he has with men on one of these megasite’s gay properties. And because he’s having the kind of sex that is actually aligned with his actual sexual orientation, you would think that the sex would be more passionate, more raw, and more authentic. You would think.

This isn’t about criticizing performers, though. This is about questioning the reasoning behind gay men producing straight porn for a gay audience. I’m told that audience is large, and that they’re paying for it, but I’m skeptical. Some gay megasites automatically include free access to their straight scenes or offer a reduced membership rate if you want access to all of a company’s sites, including the straight one (there’s rarely more than one). So, it’s not like gay consumers are purchasing memberships to gay megasites specifically for the straight porn. Then again, maybe you have a weakness for a certain male performer and you’re willing to watch him do anything, even have sex with a woman, so you’ll click over and watch him go straight for a few minutes before returning to the man-on-man section of your membership.

Treated strictly as a fetish, it’s not hard at all to understand why straight porn could appeal to gay men (some people like scat porn but they’d never actually eat shit), but imagine if a straight company decided to produce gay porn and marketed it as an “alternative” for its straight male audience. Yeah, right. So why are gay porn producers doing what straight porn producers won’t? There are at least two reasons. One, gay men are more open-minded, accepting, and willing to embrace all forms of sex (as long as there’s at least one hot guy involved), or two, gay men are self-loathing Stepin Fetchits desperate to fit in with the mainstream by hiding behind images of masculinity. Because what’s more masculine than eating pussy?

Or, maybe there’s a third reason. Maybe it is all about the performers. Maybe by promising the straight porn models who perform on gay porn megasites that they get to have sex with at least one female for every four males they have sex with, producers have given their boys a way to justify working in gay porn. Their heterosexuality is affirmed by virtue of the fact that they can be seen having sex with women (despite being seen having sex with men one click away). For straight guys in gay porn, the girls are the carrots to the sticks.

How would you describe straight porn for gay men?

 

 

 

 

 

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

46 Responses to “Straight Porn For Gay Men?”

  1. Josh says:

    Personally, I enjoy watcing straight porn more than I do gay. Just as I prefer watching amateur over MOST studio productions. The lack of creativity in gay porn and the over abundance of twink performers has really turned me off. I prefer slightly more masculine men, this does not make me less gay nor does it mean I am self-loathing it means I don’t want to fuck or jack-off to a scrawney, 98lbs, feminine man. Unfortunately most gay porn with masculine men that are NOT gay for pay tend to run into the extreme fetish which I am also not into. So watching a straight guy fuck a girl is not that hard for me because that is generally the type of man that I prefer to fantasize about; it just happens that he is fucking a pussy. Trust that I am not getting off on watching the girl but perhaps imagining myself in her place.

    Gay porn has gotten too extreme in its niches and it’s hard to find a good balanced (between masculine/femine/fetish/BSDM/Vanilla) production anymore. Everything is either catered to twink lovers or leather daddies of which I am neither soooooo as a result I find the men I like in straight porn and now that the straight for gays porn is on the market it makes it that much more easier for me to view.

  2. Estelle says:

    For the most part when you compare, some of these guys on these sites to a exclusively straight performers like Manuel Ferrara, James Deen, Rocco Reed, or Tommy Gunn you can tell that they would NEVER be able to cut it straight porn. A lot of them are just as bad at straight fucking as they are gay fucking, more then a few don’t have the dick to cut it in straight porn, and more then a few have the same wood issues that they do on a gay shoot.

    IMO, the straight porn that is made for a straight audience is much better to watch for the reasons I listed above. Also a lot of that porn shows the same POV shots of the guy (a lot of them do it much better and closer) that these “straight porn for gay men” sites have. Guys like Ferrara also exhibit a masculinity and raw sexuality that is missing in the “straight porn for gay men”. It has nothing to do with the fact that the other guys do gay porn, but that a lot of the straight only men fuck a lot better then the G4P guys that pop up on these sites. Lets face it a lot of the guys on the sites you mentioned aren’t G4P or even bi, they are gay.

    I also think that if you wear a condom with guys in your gay scenes, you should wear a condom with women in your straight scenes (remember that discussion last fall Zach). I’m still waiting to hear about a porn performer who is gay but only shoots straight porn.

    • Neil says:

      Speaking to Estelle’s statement, I would love to see out (or known out) gay performers fucking women. Or gay performers investigating their “bi” side. But I don’t agree that most or all performers on these “Straight Guys for Gay Eyes”-type sites are really “just gay.” I mean, many clearly have and do enjoy having sex with women. Some were probably drawn to that specific site precisely because they have only had sex with women and were curious or knew about the site’s gay perspective, or knew that many of the performers are eventually invited to shoot gay scenes, and wanted to go for it. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they are really just plain gay. They could really just be bi, yes, but it’s certainly possible that they also really prefer sex with women and, through their involvement with gay porn under these larger umbrella porn studios, have also learned to enjoy gay sex. It’s evolution and a sign of changing times — and is certainly NOT a one-way street to just being plain ol’ gay for all of these guys. And I don’t think it’s possible (or necessary) to quantify these numbers. Who knows what people really do in their private lives — and who knows what they’ll experiment with or get into next.

      And as for performers like Manuel Ferrara or James Deen, who have so far only shot exclusively straight porn, I agree they are great at it and exhibit a raw sexuality that’s amazing and camera-friendly, but I think it’s a safe assumption to say that their straight porn-exclusivity is first and foremost a calculated and savvy career decision, because they want to dominate and grow in the straight porn world, where studios have often been less friendly to or interested in casting men who have crossed the gay porn line. We have no idea if James Deen enjoys getting his dick sucked by a man once in a while, on the side, or if he likes fucking chicks with dicks in Florida motel rooms. Even if James signed on to this sight right now and said he didn’t dig sex with dudes, it may not be the real truth — not that I’d care or call him a liar — it’s his fucking business. We’ll never really know. And as such, speculating that all or most of the guys doing straight porn and ALSO gay porn for these “for gay eyes” sites are “really just gay” is nonsense. How would anyone know? By watching them fuck women? I’ve seen every one of these videos on Jake Cruise’s “Straight Guys for Gay Eyes” and hundreds of others from sites showing videos from a similar perspective, and I have seen on these sites MANY really good fuck scenes with dudes who clearly love fucking women. And, yes, many of these sexy women fuckers end up fucking or getting sucked off by dudes in later porn.

      I personally watch alot of the porn on these “Straight Guys for Gay Eyes”-type sites because the shit can be hot. Alot you end up knowing what turns you on and what doesn’t work. I prefer watching straight porn, but in no way am I self-hating, nor do I have issues with my own masculinity or watch it to substitute one thing for another or justify this or that. And I don’t fantasize myself as though I’m in the woman’s position — well, maybe sometimes :). I like it because it’s hot, and, yes, I enjoy it when the sex is clearly natural and raw. And condomless. If they are old enough to die in Iraq serving our industry, then they are old enough to decide for themselves if they want to use a condom or not — same goes for the porn management or production teams making the porn.

      In terms of why most gay porn doesn’t interest me — it fucking sucks! I mean, twink porn could be amazing and provocative, pushing boundaries and showing what young guys are really like. Instead we get a trite gay porn director’s (or worse, a “seasoned” gay performer-turned director’s) version of what young gays are like — baffling and nasty! All the suburban highlighted bangs, silly mall jewelry and tired, unimaginative tattoos and piercings give me no hope for the future gays in America, if they’re all like these high school dumb-asses. Is being rail thin the only casting requirement? Where’s the diversity? I saw one twink whose grey hair streak made him look like Ann Bancroft in ‘The Miracle Worker,’ (kinda cool) and the dude was thrown in with guys who clearly had no interest in him — a mistake and wasted opportunity by a fag director who doesn’t give a shit or is blind to the reality who of gay youth are.

      And gay porn reeks as bad as it did 15 or 20 years ago. Same poses, same dumb stories and sets, same hairless, passionless faggots who would surely turn 100 more heads in gay bars than I would, and I am sure are considered “ideal” types by many gays, but in the end add nothing to the world with their presence on screen, add nothing to the adult film industry — have no point in being on film at all for that matter, than to reaffirm a dead-eyed, “clean cut All-American”-obsessed gay sensibility. Even Treasure Island Media’s and alot of bareback porn I see has clearly fallen into a rut — Dawson could take 500,000 loads up his ass and won’t be able to save this empty, lifeless bullshit. I mean look at Chi Chi LaRue’s stuff. The man has a studio and enough money to do whatever he wants — and chooses to make that crap? Unacceptable.

      • cid says:

        “but in no way am I self-hating”

        Yeah right.

        • Neil says:

          Ha! That got me. I can’t imagine why you think I hate myself, just from what I said. I mean, I’m looking at the issue in the eye, giving my opinion, and supporting it with examples. I was out of the closet when I was 18 (clueless Texan boy), was the head of my college’s gay activist group, member of ACT-UP in New York, and have always been open and honest with people I meet, gays and straights alike, whether family, employers or dudes at the corner straight bar, about who I am and the principles that guide my life. If you think that because I am critical of mainstream gay sensibilities concerning masculinity and looks, then I must be ugly or “not ideal,” then I still don’t see how this would make me self-hating. I don’t shoulder the hate or derision or social disapproval I get from others, including gays. I bear witness to it, I remember it, I laugh about it (sometimes with whiskey), and I grow stronger from it. Why do you think I hate myself?

          • cid says:

            I think you have issues with homosexuality because your whole post basically reads:

            Straight men = awesome. Sex with women = awesome, should be more of it.

            “Faggots” as you put it, and sex with men = fucking lame, stupid, should be less of it, even the gay ones should be having straight sex and turn bi.

            I don’t know you personally, and from reading your post I’d very much like to keep it that way but I do feel that your post was so overwhelmingly biased toward straight porn and so lauding of straight men, and gay 4 pay models in general, while so negative and deriding of “faggots” and all gay porn that I must assume it may very well be a shill posting and maybe you are disingenuous in your response post, since I don’t believe any man who fought for gay rights would write so disrespectfully and negatively of them.

          • Neil says:

            Cid, I use the term “faggot” because I am one. I am completely at ease with being a faggot, being a gay man . . . and a lady . . . and I am just speaking plainly the way I always do. I can’t see how or why you think I want less gay sex and more straight sex in the world. That’s not in my post at all. We are talking about porn. I mean, come on, Cid, if you re-read my post you can see that I desperately want there to be exciting and interesting gay porn out there – I just don’t see any of it getting made.

            My post was responding to the general topic at hand about gay-4-pay porn and porn performers, and I offered my perspective and expressed my porn sensibility — what I find hot, and why. If you sense disrespect for gay men in my words, I am afraid you misread me entirely — I am disappointed, yes, that well-funded gay porn directors and studios can’t come up with fuck flicks without dragging in the same tropes and tripe we’ve been forced to endured for years. But I appreciate your opinion and, just to say it, would welcome the chance to meet you or anyone on this site in person, if only so you/y’all could hear my perspective from me directly, and because I think it’s important to engage in thoughtful, fun, filthy discussion about the current state of pornography, if only to make it better, and so that, perhaps, together we can piss on the shame Americans throw at sex, sex workers, porn performers, and faggots in general.

      • sxg says:

        10 sentence limit next time please.

      • marissa says:

        So many complaints about porn. I think you just watch too much of it and are hence desensitized. Perhaps a break is in order yes?

  3. sxg says:

    I love both gay & straight porn. Not lesbian porn because the view of a vagina just sickens me. But I will say that the guys in gay porn a way better looking than those in straight porn. However, the guys in straight porn seem more into the sex a little bit more than those in gay porn.

    Straight porn for gays pretty much has both of them together. They exclude the Ron Jeremys & Rocco Sifredis of straight porn and get the straight guys that you wish you can convert! Plus it focuses more on the guy rather than the girl. So I like it. I still like my gay porn more, but never hurts to enjoy straight porn that’s good!

    • Hi god, are you there? its me, Madonna says:

      “However, the guys in straight porn seem more into the sex a little bit more than those in gay porn.”

      Now, female consumers of gay porn would say the EXACT opposite of you. Is female consumption of gay porn normal behavior? No. It is an outlier, and we always a deviation from the norm… AND I would hope that everyone can agree, it is perfectly OKAY to be different.

      While I agree with Zack in some part, it is Ego behind motivations and desires to work in this industry. So naturally, in some part, the act of heterosexual sex does reinforce a sense of machismo. For men in the industry, domination of women is a matter of sexual power, its not about women themselves or looking to provide pleasure for those female partners. Its primarily about Ego. Women ‘sense’ this and may actually prefer watching gay porn because they claim, unlike straight porn, ‘there is passion and a sense of connection between two gay men.’ Every so often I have to ask, when viewers of ANY genre make such a claim, how can people REALLY tell? Is there some way of measuring this? Do we even know if the participants are actually ‘connected’? OR are they just fantasizing about something/someone else? Is this just a manifestation of getting off by breaking a taboo, or being an exhibitionist?

      For a gold star gay like me, I can never truly understand why people behave the way they do, let alone G4Payers’.

      I can only speculate… Sometimes, it is just like asking someone what their favorite ice cream is, and then asking them to justify or rationalize it– you are not going to have a conclusive answer for questions about personal tastes and preferences. It ends up being a wash.

    • Josh says:

      ” They exclude the Ron Jeremys & Rocco Sifredis of straight porn and get the straight guys that you wish you can convert!”

      Well said! Although Ron Jeremy was pretty hot in his early years lol.

  4. Asenath says:

    Above all things, it is a commercial concern. So, if it weren’t selling, it wouldn’t be offered.

  5. MIke says:

    There are some hot raunchy straight performers like Manuel Ferrara and Erik Everhard who are just hot to watch because they are “take no prisoner” porn performers. Like Estelle said if the performer is boring in a gay flick they’re going to be as equally boring in a straight one.

    • Hi god, are you there? its me, Madonna says:

      Yes. I agree they can be looked at as hot in some photos. But when I see them in film, I think they are just douchebags.

  6. Stu says:

    The presence of lady bits is a complete turn off for me no matter how hot the guy is, so I don’t see the appeal of “straight for the gays” porn at all. Obviously there are enough people that do like it to make it profitable, so as long as that continues they will keep making it.

  7. Alex says:

    I prefer watching straight porn MUCH more than I do for gay porn, and I’m 200% gay. You can consider it a fetish but it’s certain that I’m not the only one.

    • Alex says:

      OK you are gonna have to choose another name….LOL…I comment on here all the time and I don’t want anyone thinking I endorse this crap.

      For some of those companies it is an “incentive program”. NDS and Corbin Fisher use it to get guys to agree to sign exclusives -with promises of straight scenes. Kevin Crowes left Jake Cruise for NDS because it would allow him to work behind the scenes at Cocky Boys AND film with women monthly. He couldn’t be guaranteed that at JC.

      Next Door uses it as a hook. They tell Tyler Torro, for instance, he does a solo, he lets a guy blow him, and fucks a guy and then gets to fuck a chick for the same rate. A rate he would never command on the straight side.

      I think it is much more of an issue on the NDS sites because if you choose to go to Next Door Hook Ups so be it but all the sites except Twinks, Austin Wilde, and Buddies feature straight scenes – some of them at least once a month.

      The other issue is the when you have female porn starst on set and shit happens behind the scenes. The gay4payers are gonna try and act all butch and that is when they let their homophobia show.

      • Rocco says:

        It’s not about your like or dislike of straight porn or the combination of sexualities of the performers!

        The question is why are we, as gay guys, subsidizing pussy for guys that couldn’t get paid to have sex with women on the straight side of porn?

        Why should they get paid more to have sex with a woman on a gay site than they would if it were a straight porn company? Pay them the same $100-$200 they would get at a straight porn company!

        Or, for that matter, pay more to recruit hot guys that “ENJOY” sex with guys!

        I really enjoy searching the tube sites for hot sweaty man sex! Go XTUBE!

        I’ve watched the behind-the-scenes footage at NDS and it’s an “okay” enviroment until a chick shows up on-set! The mood changes – the guys jockey for her attention – trying to be cool in front of the chick. The BTS camera guy will forget about the guys and follow the chick around like a lost puppy – apparently he is straight – not to mention catching some off-color remarks! I have to say when Tommy D and Mason were there it was more “gay friendly” – which is absurd statement considering it’s gay porn; you could often catch Mason genuinely ripping on Cody, which I found hilarious!

        I remember Mick Hicks on several occaisions having to remind the guys, to watch their comment, because they were being filmed for BTS footage and once snapped at a guy doing a groupd scene that didn’t kiss-suck-rim-anal; he told him to grab another guys dick and he hesitated and Mick yelled “don’t tell me you won’t hold a dick”, you could see the frustration on his face! He used to vent to the old BTS camera guy (gay) but is now one of only a few gay guys left @ NDS!

        BTW, Bambi the make-up “lady” @NDS is the funniest person there!

  8. jjoni_nunes says:

    Honestly is something that doesn’t attract me at all .And as was mentioned a “straight” performer that is terrible in gay porn will be equally boring in these straight movies. I think that is very weird that some of these guys that are openly gay 4pay receive HUGE attention and work in major studios even if they are just TERRIBLE in their man2man scenes. And I also agree that if u use condom in your gay scenes you must do the same in the straight ones.

  9. mateo77 says:

    for me I love straight porn just as much as gay porn. I find that the men are hotter, I love the masculinity and there is a bigger diversity. I imagine myself with that straight guy, and it’s a complete turn-on. I just don’t focus on the lady bits….

  10. Carlos Eduardo says:

    The straight guy fetish is an old, the gay guys who used to have that fetish is desappearing cause they are old and in their youth there wasn’t so many kinds of gay men. What is more practical is see a straight dude that is sexually attracted for men. This is more of a social problem then a fetish!

  11. Res says:

    All the comments in this thread basically sum up the gay-for-pay thing. People like it. I don’t, but there are gay men out there who do. Do I loathe and judge those gay men? Absolutely.

  12. A says:

    I know my straight female friends who watch porn like it. I know women aren’t exactly a sizable market but I think it’s cool that there is porn for females out there (even though it is marketed to gay men). I’m not really into straight porn but if I was a straight chick and I was forced to watch Brazzers I would probably kill myself.

    • F says:

      As a female, I prefer the porn marketed to gay men.

      For me, heterosexual porn is mostly marketed to males.
      It’s extremely hard and time wasting to try and find porn which includes what I want to see.

      Like you guys, I want to see fit spunky men with yummy cocks and bods having sex, not formulaic close ups of females faces faking hour long orgasms.
      I find most straight porn is derogatory, the women aren’t treated how I would want to be treated. I don’t want to imagine I’m her. I don’t want to have sex with him when he’s being an inconsiderate dominating wanker. Do the girls ever get off in straight porn?
      Maybe I need to look harder.

      I get off on straight porn despite what’s screening, not because of it.

      I presume most people think there’s no point in marketing porn for females because females aren’t visual.
      We’re visual, there’s just no porn adequately marketed to us.

      I want to see what you guys want to see (although I don’t mind the lady bits so much).
      So, here I am.

      :/

  13. manu says:

    “Straight” porn is interesting when the women buttfuck the men with STrap-on dildos , I LOVE IT , otherwise it’s crap and I don’t want to see it.

  14. Rovex says:

    If it has tits and cunt in it im not interested.

  15. niles says:

    A lot of the straight porn these days is wilder and “gayer” than gay porn – just check out some of the gangbang or group action flicks. They may not suck cock, but they sure don’t mind frottage, DP, you name it as long as there’s a girl involved. And no, not all of us are repulsed by naked women.

    • Rovex says:

      How is it ‘gayer’. ‘Gay’ means man on man, not man on woman, with a few other men around. Perhaps its a bit ‘Bi-er’?

  16. nikko says:

    Straight porn is so vulgar towards women- like gonzo porn. Just vile. Yuck.

    • DJ says:

      Completely agree! The “real” straight porn is degrading, violent, sloppy and bareback. The only up is the big dicks.

  17. DL says:

    Some straight porn can be hot if the woman is not yelping like a chihuahua. Women in porn can be way nastier than any gay porn I’ve seen.

  18. Woohooboy says:

    Is that there is obviously a market out there who wants this kind of content (how big that market is, is frankly anyone’s guess). As a gay guy, it holds very little interest for me. I prefer guy on guy action myself. The bisexual market of porn is something that has been attempted on a number of occasions in the past with varying degrees of success. In short, you are trying to appeal to two very different demographics. For straight guys, I don’t imagine (outside of a passing curiosity at best) why they would want to see two men get it on. Conversely there is little or no appeal for gay guys to check out two women or a guy and a girl (unless the guy is hot and even then some may not even want to go there). And as for straight women, some may well be into it, but I gather most aren’t.

    Which leaves Bi guys and girls as the primary viewing audiences for these porn sites. “Gay For Pay” has become something that’s been viewed very critically within the gay porn industry. Some websites out there still flaunt this tag rather proudly whilst others try and steer clear of it. Again as a gay guy, I’m not a fan of the whole “Straight man gets pushed into gay sex for money” scenerio. The whole concept strikes me as a cheap stunt that holds little appeal at all. Seeing guys who are passionately and genuinely into other guys is a big turn on.

    In short, it’s what floats your boat at the end of the day. Different strokes for different folks…..

  19. Zee says:

    I don’t watch Straight Porn, I have before and I’ve looked at clips with certain guys but it does nothing for me. It just doesn’t appeal to me anymore. I like My men Gay. Gay and fucking. If I’m gonna spend my money on Porn, it’s gonna be 100% Gay.

  20. Kelo says:

    As a straight girl, I like watching straight for gay porn for the lulz. Nothing sexy about it.

    #gaymantrappedingirlsbodysyndrome

  21. mr man says:

    Was going to comment, but it appears we have a few people that have submitted their 2000 word thesis *yawn*

    • Neil says:

      That’s me. Mine’s the biggest! But, no, I accept admonishment and will keep it short next time, but I read all the comments and wanted my response to address several veins of discussion on the board . . . all in one posting. I just find it fascinating how many gay dudes here just will not “100%” nevah-evah look at straight porn. Thesis-worthy.

  22. Ryan Raz says:

    I was saying for years that I wanted to do that. If you know me then you know I am gay, but I would still do it.

  23. jessi says:

    The only kind of straight porn I like to watch is DP, and the kind where both guys are in the same hole. I’ve watched DP in gay porn that was boring and yawn inducing (even bareback). The men didn’t look happy to be there, but the men in the straight DP videos are usually very raw and intense.

  24. Absynthe says:

    As a straight girl, I’m completely turned off by any porn containing girl bits in it. Most of the girls in porn are totally nasty. Everything about it turns me off. The sounds they make, the hideous fake boobs, the caked-on makeup, over-bleached hair… Ugh, I just totally grossed myself out.

    I’d rather watch bad gay porn than great straight porn ( whatever that is ). Nothing is sexier than a man. Except maybe two men. Doing dirty, nasty things to each other that aren’t legal in all 50 states. The messier, the better!

    When I’ve had subscriptions to sites that also had “straight” porn, like the CF site, I had zero interest in it and never watched it.

    • mark says:

      I agree with you, and I’m a gay male. I’ve tried to get into str8 porn when the guy was really hot (like Johnny Castle and Charles Dera), but even their extreme hotness couldn’t take away the fact that girl bits were in the video. True, not all gay porn is good, but then neither is all str8 porn. To each their own, I guess.

  25. Jack says:

    This seems to be a trend at gay porn sites and for me it is totally annoying and a turn-off. I am NOT into women physically. Why do you think I’m interested in looking at women sexually. DUH! I have already deleted some sites that continued to force on me something that do not like. I no more want to view hetro sex than I do animal sex.

  26. Dev says:

    Straight porn 4 gay men, what the hell does that even mean? this concept makes no sense to me.
    One other thing, what is all this dribble about there being no masculine gay guys in gay porn? that’s stupid and not true, Michael Lucas features very masculine gay guys who are hot and freaky. There are multiple gay porn studios that have macho hot sex, so don’t sit there and lie about the stuff not being out there, you guys just like the idea of watching something you can’t have.
    I can admit that some straight guys are very hot but I’m not going to sit through a entire scene of them fucking a girl, the reason that this shit is appealing too some gay guys is their business, but I surly don’t have to support it.

  27. krkrk says:

    It’s cool cause, if you’re not yet outed, you can watch those straight porn made for gays and if sombedoy discovers them, he or she will never know that you’re gay. While if it’s gay porn, the guy or the girl who found your videos will straightly know you’re gay :P

  28. Rex says:

    I’m gay and I love watching straight porn so much it’s the only porn I watch.

    I’d love to see an out 100% gay pornstar whose never fucked a chick fuck a chick just to see his reaction to how she feels.

Leave a Reply

GET THE NEWSLETTER
Email address:


To unsubscribe (click here)












Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Free WordPress Themes | Thanks to WordPress news theme, WordPress magazine theme and Premium WordPress Themes