Is This Jarec Wentworth’s Final Porn Scene, Or…?

Men.com is being cagey about how many more Jarec Wentworth scenes they have shot and ready to release, and they’re not making any sort of big deal about this one, which comes out on Monday (4/20) called Longing, in which Jarec fucks the cum out of Christopher Daniels on a couch.

The aesthetic is a little different here — a bunch of lingering close-ups, sex that looks like it’s supposed to be loving and intimate or something — so maybe Men.com is going for a CockyBoys feel?

In any event, this may be Jarec’s final shot scene with Men.com or it may not. The Sword reached out to the company to find out how many more they have, but they have not wanted to say.

Now that Jarec is in jail, without bail, getting ready to stand trial next month, there’s only so many scenes the company could have in the can. But how many more are there?

If this ends up being the last, Christopher Daniels will have the dubious honor of being Jarec’s last on-camera fuck. At least it looks like it was a pretty good (if not great) one.

jarec-chris-men-com-0

jarec-chris-men

jarec-chris-men-com-1

jarec-chris-men-com-2

jarec-chris-men-com-3

jarec-chris-men-com-4

 

 

[Men.com: Longing]

Previously: HERE’S ONE OF JAREC WENTWORTH’S FINAL SCENES AS A PORN STAR, FUCKING SETH SANTORO IN MEN.COM’S ‘THE LISTENER’

 

11 thoughts on “Is This Jarec Wentworth’s Final Porn Scene, Or…?”

  1. I use to think that the real dark beard made Jarec look sinister. Who knew the beard probably wasn’t necessary.

  2. Afro Puerto Rican

    LOL@Seahawksfan; you are right about that. That would be one hot porn movie with Aaron Hernandez and Jarec Wentworth. I would like to see Aaron bottom too and Jarec fuck him raw.

    1. A flip-flop would be interesting as well, I admit. But the idea of Jarec begging for and being dominated and pounded by Aaron’s big thug dick is almost too much to contemplate. End it with Jarec slurping greedily Aaron’s cum and I might have a heart attack! I could get off just thinking about it. We have to stop talking about it! lol!

  3. First of all, he is in jail not prison (yet). Second, he is highly unlikely to receive much more than 2 years if that. The indictment did not include a weapons charge so there is that. Also there is a large incentive for the prosecution to make this go away because of the sleaze factor of Donald Burns hiring prostitutes and nothing seems to be being pursued about that. The laws against interstate prostitution are pretty tough and were designed to protect young, vulnerable women. They used to be referred to as the “white slave” laws in the pre political correctness days. There is also the additional factor that Don Burns wants to limit publicity as much as possible, witness his name being legally withheld for the trial (despite the fact that it is readily available all over the net).

    That being said, the suggestion of a scene between Aaron Hernandez and Jarec Wentworth is very hot fantasy. It would be delicious watching Aaron the thug totally dominate Jarec in every way. Jesus, that would be a blockbuster in the world of gay porn and the producer of many a gay orgasm!

    1. “…he is highly unlikely to receive much more than 2 years if that”

      The statute under which he is charged authorizes a MAXIMUM prison term of TWO years.

      The judge doesn’t get to increase the term beyond the maximum authorized by the statute.

      The gun found in parked car is completely irrelevant to the charge or the sentencing.

  4. Afro Puerto Rican

    If Jarec Wentworth is convicted and sent to prison, he should share a cell with Aaron Hernandez. They both should make a hot porn movie in prison with both being flipped flopped. I heard Aaron Hernandez has a big fat cock and I would love to see him place it inside Jarec Wentworth raw. Now that would be hot….

  5. It’s always hard to tell, it seems. For a couple months after he went away, new stuff was coming out on Robert Van Damme, and when Liam Magnuson announced his retirement in October 2013, his new stuff didn’t stop coming till the following February.

    Even if Wentworth is dealt the max 15 years we’ve read, with good behavior, he could still have a life left. Maybe not one in porn, but a life. I don’t think he deserves the worst prison. The gun found was in the car, not on his person, and none of the texts he sent threaten physical violence either.

    Laugh at me if you want, but it does haunt me when one of ours stars, so abundantly gifted by Mother Nature and intelligent too, torpedoes themselves like this.

    1. “Even if Wentworth is dealt the max 15 years we’ve read,…”

      That idiot Zach Sire from Str8UpGayPorn is the one who spread the nonsense about an 15-year maximum sentence. Zach Sire is a font of incorrect information, disinformation, foolish notions and yellow journalism.

      It is the USE of a gun in the COMMISSION of a crime, not the mere presence of a gun at the site of the arrest, that could increase the sentence in certain VIOLENT crimes. Blackmail is a white-collar crime, not a violent crime. Even if Wentworth had a gun in his back pocket at the time of his arrest, that would have ZERO affect on the federal charge or the maximum sentence that the charge carries.

      The sole charge Wentworth faces is one count of 18 USC 875(d): “Whoever, with intent to extort from any person, firm, association, or corporation, any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to injure the property or reputation of the addressee or of another or the reputation of a deceased person or any threat to accuse the addressee or any other person of a crime, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

      NB: “…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

      The judge doesn’t get to make up a harsher sentence than the one authorized by the charging statute.

      Zach Sire’s/Str8UpGayPorn’s opinions about the case, though many, are not worth a penny!!!

      1. @Reynard
        Let me first say, I don’t know much about the story, just what I’ve read here and there, but haven’t really delved into the details. However, I’ve read various reports that conflict with your assertion that there are no weapons charges and the 15 year maximum is nonsense. Most notably a story at XBIZ that says Wentworth’s counsel is seeking to have the weapons charges dropped and they also cite the 15 year sentence in the same piece. If there’s no merit to your claim that there are no weapons charges pending, why did Wentworth’s lawyers file a motion to have the gun evidence suppressed in order to have the weapons charges dropped? http://www.xbiz.com/news/glbt/193520

        1. What you may read “here and there” about the case is often incorrect.

          1) Contrary to what the XBIZ article’s title, “Wentworth’s Counsel Seeks to Have Weapons Charge Dropped,” suggests, there is in fact NO WEAPON’S CHARGE.
          2) The article’s claim that “Wentworth … faces more than 15 years in prison, if convicted” is incorrect.
          3) The Indictment doesn’t even mention a weapon. The only charge specified in the Indictment is 18 USC 875(d), which carries a maximum term of 2 years and/or a maximum fine of $250,000.
          4) Therefore, if convicted, the defendant faces no more than 2 years in prison, not more than 15.
          5) Having a gun in a bag in a parked car is NOT a federal offense. Local laws, not federal laws, determine the proper way to transport a gun in a car.
          6) Contrary to what has been claimed “here and there,” the gun in question was not even loaded.
          7) Your question, “Why did Wentworth’s lawyers file a motion to have the gun evidence suppressed in order to have the weapons charges dropped,” incorrectly assumes there’s a weapon’s charge, when in fact, THERE IS NO WEAPON’S CHARGE. Therefore, there is no weapon’s charge to drop.
          8) The gun and the defendant’s cell phone were both found in Yim’s car. If you actually read the motion, as I did, the motion argues that Yim’s consent to search his car was not knowing or voluntary, and therefore illegal, and therefore ALL evidence obtained from the search of Yim’s car should be excluded. It is clear the real purpose of the motion is to exclude evidence obtained from the defendant’s cell phone, since the gun, unlike the cell phone, is completely irrelevant to the charge, the sentencing, and the government’s case.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top