RELATED:

So let me get this "straight" no pun intended. It's safer to have unprotected sex because of testing, but not safe to have protected sex because lack of testing. Uh huh. I'm not passing judgmenton anyone adult performer, but that was a lamest shit I ever heard.

the article does not state that it's "not safe to have protected sex" dimwit

People who demand that their porn stars only fuck like themselves are deeply, psychologically broken people and pathetically possessive/needy.

Bisexuality and recreational experimentation threatens their whole identity. Not what they do -- what STRANGERS do -- threatens their absolute notion of who they are or what gays should be allowed to be. So many of them are terrified that if they admit fucking a pussy, or even THE POTENTIAL for a pussy to be hot and fun, they will have to "turn straight" for heterosexist society and Christians.

Sorry, guys. Nobody's cross-gender experimentation can change one's sexual orientation or needs. And having a genuine bisexual orientation is A-OK! So is pussy play for fun.

I'm always disappointed in gay men who hate the vagina, think it's disgusting or can't see any virtues to ANY woman's sexual potential. That's a bigotry and a phobia EXACTLY LIKE homophobia.

When are people going to stop seeing sex that's different from what they prefer as BAD and start seeing it as AWESOME and BEAUTIFUL for others?

As expected, the focus here is on all the "pussy is gross" comments, and most of the legitimate and valid negative responses to this film have been completely overlooked by the commentator and Arpad himself. So could someone please tell me:

1) Why is it a man who has done hundreds of scenes with guys, all with condoms, and then does one with a girl WITHOUT a condom can't grasp the fact that his fan base will immediately pick up on the discrepancy? I'm sorry, but if he really cared about his health, he wouldn't be fucking without a condom, no matter what testing had or hadn't been done. The fact that he's uncut also means the rate of transmission is higher for him than a cut guy, so there's no excuse whatsoever in him not wearing a condom, regardless of who he's fucking.

2) Why, as a gay man, am I supposed to find a gay man fucking a woman to be exciting? The whole "if you don't like it, don't watch it" talk is complete bullshit and glosses over the fact that this clip has been heavily marketed toward GAY MEN--not straight or bi men or women, but GAY MEN. It appears on the "Straight Guys for GAY Eyes" site, for goodness sake. Whether you watch it or not, if you follow gay porn on the Web, you can't avoid the damn thing. It's everywhere, pushed by the studio. The pics are all over the place on GAY sites where gay men frequent, and Arpad is one of the biggest names in GAY porn. No, you don't have to watch the film, but you can't avoid the photos as they are all over the place.

3) If Arpad really is "100% gay," as the marketing has gone out of their way to stress, then why did he want to fuck a girl in the first place? And why is he on a site where the guys are "straight"? The whole thing is such a huge contradiction that it's ridiculous: Here's a man fucking a woman yet going out of his way to emphasize "no, guys, I'm really gay." So what does that really say? I'm basically just a whore who will fuck any hole for a paycheck and nothing more? If we're not supposed to be believe that he's straight, then why the hell should we believe he's genuinely gay? These people contradict themselves all the time, so I never assume any of them are truly gay, no matter what they say. Even Jasun Mark (the director of this film) has gone on record as saying at least half of the gay for pay performers in the biz aren't really straight, even though they swear that they are. Sorry, but you just can't have it both ways. If those guys can lie, so can any other performer.

4) Yes, this is "just porn," but if gay porn is supposed to be about creating a fantasy that keeps gay viewers aroused, yet you put something out there that significantly turns off a LOT of gay viewers, doesn't that sort of defeat the whole purpose?

5) Lastly, in response to Gavin's post: If you truly enjoy "pussy play for fun," then please just do me one favor: NEVER call yourself a homosexual because that, like the marketing for this film, would be a lie. You may be a bisexual, which is perfectly fine and a truly awesome orientation for those who genuinely have and feel a sexual connection with both genders. But please don't misrepresent your self when your actions clearly indicate otherwise. Fucking and enjoying pussy while declaring, "I'm really gay and am only doing this for fun" is a biggest load of bullshit that anyone can come up with. If a guy called himself straight yet said he only enjoyed fucking guys "for fun," would you really and truly think of him as straight--espec ially "100% straight"? No...I didn't think so.

I believe Arpad infers it's not safe to have gay sex, when he states "in gay scenes, you have to assume that your partner is positive". Yet he willingly participates in these scenes. He could've used a condom for the straight scene, but I imagine it came down to money. As I stated before, he can fuck whatever he wants, I'm not passing judgement. I just thought his reasoning was faulty.

Don't worry about the haters Arpad. I met you on the "F" train back in July. Super cool guy.

Arpad's statement, "They [gay male viewers] just can't stand pussy, and they can't stand to see someone they're a fan of fucking pussy," is almost laughable. After 14 years of performing in gay porn and becoming one of the biggest names in the industry, he's just now realizing that gay men are significantly turned OFF by pussy???? What planet has he been living on? Newsflash: If we actually LIKED pussy, then we wouldn't be GAY! For what it's worth, I personally am not repulsed by vaginas or the female body in general, and I can appreciate many forms of human sexuality and erotica. But yes, hearing a "gay" man describe the natural wetness and softness of pussy does make me cringe.

Instead of bitching and moaning about the backlash, how about doing the adult thing and taking responsibility for it? You fucked a chick for a paycheck and consequently turned off a significant number of your gay fans. Just own up to it instead of making excuses by blaming those "pussy hating" fags.

Seeing Arpad do this doesn't surprise me at all. A while back I ran across his website & when I wanted to enter to look at his photos, it said I had to pay .00 to see the photos. Why would I pay for something that is already seen all over the net? I'm sure most of you will not agree with this next statement but, its my opinion & that's all that matters. One can say they're anything but, in reality you're either gay or straight you can't be both. So if he's saying he's both, he's in denial which a lot of people are. What it comes down to is Arpad is doing what others do everyday, he goes to work to make money. The thing is, he should worry about whether or not his fans will stay loyal after this stunt. I for one don't like pussy & I'm not going to try it just to make a quick buck. No gay man ever would. So, what does that make Arpad really? I think he can answer that one himself.

Arpad comes from a third world country, has no real abilities to work from, and is fucking old! Porn is his only means to make money, and his career is slumping. The straight-for-pa y shoot was to be controversial and to get attention because he a losing work. He is desperate to get attention, and I'm not interested.

I'm a fan of an old porn star that has done it all -- Peter North / Matt Ramsey.
(Actually, NOT "all" -- it turns out that he’s never "topped" as Matt Ramsey.)
Until age 28, I thought I was straight. I've been with my first-and-only gay since 1976.
(OK, it's and open "marriage" , he was the first, but HARDly the "only".)

I like Arpad's accurate description of the difference between ass holes and cunts.
A vagina is THE most penis friendly orifice there is.
It doesn't have teeth (of course it doesn't have a tongue either)
It isn't just a "ring" in between to muscular mounds of flesh. (I DO like that!)
It fits like a glove all the way in (and all the way out).
It is self-lubed.
AND
for us bi-guys, it's positioned so that we can play with the other "toys".

Thank you Arpad and (who ever the "reporter" is). I love the tone of this report.